loading...| Preferred Name |
organization |
| Definitions |
一个组织是一个可以扮演角色，有成员，有一套组织规则的连续性实体。组织成员既可以是组织自己也可以是个人。成员可以承担在组织规则中确定的特定组织成员角色。组织规则还决定组织成员如何代表组织做出决定。 An organization is a continuant entity which can play roles, has members, and has a set of organization rules. Members of organizations are either organizations themselves or individual people. Members can bear specific organization member roles that are determined in the organization rules. The organization rules also determine how decisions are made on behalf of the organization by the organization members. |
| ID |
http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OBI_0000245 |
| comment |
一个组织是一个可以扮演角色，有成员，有一套组织规则的连续性实体。组织成员既可以是组织自己也可以是个人。成员可以承担在组织规则中确定的特定组织成员角色。组织规则还决定组织成员如何代表组织做出决定。 An organization is a continuant entity which can play roles, has members, and has a set of organization rules. Members of organizations are either organizations themselves or individual people. Members can bear specific organization member roles that are determined in the organization rules. The organization rules also determine how decisions are made on behalf of the organization by the organization members. |
| definition source |
MO_177 GROUP: OBI |
| editor preferred label |
organization 组织 |
| example of usage |
PMID: 16353909.AAPS J. 2005 Sep 22;7(2):E274-80. Review. The joint food and agriculture organization of the United Nations/World Health Organization Expert Committee on Food Additives and its role in the evaluation of the safety of veterinary drug residues in foods. |
| has curation status | |
| label |
organization 组织 |
| prefixIRI |
OBI:0000245 |
| prefLabel |
organization |
| seeAlso |
EFO_URI: http://www.ebi.ac.uk/efo/EFO_0002010 |
| textual definition |
An entity that can bear roles, has members, and has a set of organization rules. Members of organizations are either organizations themselves or individual people. Members can bear specific organization member roles that are determined in the organization rules. The organization rules also determine how decisions are made on behalf of the organization by the organization members. 一个可以担任角色的实体，有成员，并有一套组织规则。组织成员既可以是组织自己也可以是个人。成员可以承担在组织规则中确定的特定组织成员角色。组织规则还决定组织成员如何代表组织做出决定。 |
| 引自 | |
| 替代术语 |
组织 organisation |
| 术语编辑者 |
James Malone PERSON: Bjoern Peters PERSON: Alan Ruttenberg PERSON: Philippe Rocca-Serra Tomasz Adamusiak PERSON: Susanna Sansone Jie Zheng |
| 编者注 |
BP：定义总结了关于OBI开发者、角色、生物材料和否定者分支机构的长时间电子邮件讨论。如果一个组织是一个物质实体或一个依赖性常体，它就会开放，因为没有达成共识。因此，目前作为材料的安排是暂时的，以便随着发展而前进。以下是定义所依据的整个电子邮件的总结： 1）有组织会员（总裁，会计，分支机构 编辑），个人作为承担者 2）有组织_角色（雇主，所有者，供应商，专利持有人） 3）组织有一个章程/规定/细则，规定了哪些角色 有，应该如何实现，以及如何修改 章程/规定/细则本身。 值得商榷的是组织本身是什么（某种程度上的依赖性 常体或一群人）。这也决定了谁/什么 组织角色的持有者“是。我个人最喜欢的还是定义 组织作为一种“法律实体”，但是通过它会导致 各种明显超出OBI范围的问题。 有趣的是，我们放置的位置似乎并不重要 组织本身，只要我们可以将其子类化（大学、公司、 政府机构、医院），实例化它（Affymetrix、NCBI、NIH、ISO、 W3C、俄克拉荷马大学），并发挥其作用。 这引出了我的建议：我们通过陈述1 - 3来定义组织 但目前没有一个“是一个”的声明。我们可以把它留在其 在is_a层次结构（物质实体）中的当前位置或将其移动到 '常体'上。我们对BFO进一步澄清，并暂时关闭这个问题 BP: The definition summarizes long email discussions on the OBI developer, roles, biomaterial and denrie branches. It leaves open if an organization is a material entity or a dependent continuant, as no consensus was reached on that. The current placement as material is therefore temporary, in order to move forward with development. Here is the entire email summary, on which the definition is based: 1) there are organization_member_roles (president, treasurer, branch editor), with individual persons as bearers 2) there are organization_roles (employer, owner, vendor, patent holder) 3) an organization has a charter / rules / bylaws, which specify what roles there are, how they should be realized, and how to modify the charter/rules/bylaws themselves. It is debatable what the organization itself is (some kind of dependent continuant or an aggregate of people). This also determines who/what the bearer of organization_roles' are. My personal favorite is still to define organization as a kind of 'legal entity', but thinking it through leads to all kinds of questions that are clearly outside the scope of OBI. Interestingly enough, it does not seem to matter much where we place organization itself, as long as we can subclass it (University, Corporation, Government Agency, Hospital), instantiate it (Affymetrix, NCBI, NIH, ISO, W3C, University of Oklahoma), and have it play roles. This leads to my proposal: We define organization through the statements 1 - 3 above, but without an 'is a' statement for now. We can leave it in its current place in the is_a hierarchy (material entity) or move it up to 'continuant'. We leave further clarifications to BFO, and close this issue for now. |
| subClassOf |